declr Founding cohort · first fifty people

For developers running coding agents

Give your agents the context to keep going.

declr gives your coding agents a shared record of tasks, decisions, ownership and handoffs. They can pick up the work, coordinate with each other and leave a useful trail. You spend less time repeating the plan and piecing together what happened.

For one agent across sessions, or several working together.

From the agent’s side

What your agents need. What you get back.

Every session starts with a context limit. Every swarm has moving parts. A shared working record gives agents somewhere to find what they need and leave what they learn.

What your agent needs

“Get me oriented.”

What declr provides

The goal, relevant decisions, known issues and last checkpoint in one compact briefing.

What you get back

Less repeating yourself.

The next session can pick up the work without you retelling its history.

What your agent needs

“Give me work I can start.”

What declr provides

A next task with dependencies and existing reservations considered.

What you get back

Less routing work.

Agents can find useful work while other tasks wait for a decision or a dependency.

What your agent needs

“Show me who owns what.”

What declr provides

Shared assignments and file leases show who is working where. An overlap points to the holder and their task.

What you get back

Smoother parallel work.

Agents have the information to coordinate before an overlap becomes your problem.

What your agent needs

“Keep track of my subagents.”

What declr provides

Assignments, checkpoints and blockers stay attached to the shared task graph.

What you get back

Less supervising the supervisor.

You or the next orchestrator can follow delegated work after the original session ends.

What your agent needs

“Let me leave what I found.”

What declr provides

A quick way to record a failure, question or discovery against its task and path.

What you get back

Less rediscovery.

What one agent learns is available to the agents that follow.

What your agent needs

“Help me hand this over.”

What declr provides

Changes, checks and open questions travel with the task to a separate verifier.

What you get back

Easier review.

The reviewer can see what was checked and what still needs attention.

Back on your side

See where the work stands without reconstructing it.

Your agents leave a working record as they go. You see what is moving, what needs your decision and what is ready for review. Open a task when you need the context behind it.

acme / billing-rewriteRoadmap · Inbox · Agents · Decisions · Known issuesTue 14:32 · synced to Linear 2m ago
PIECES DONE 27 of 58 known IN FLIGHT 3 agents · 3 leases WAITING ON YOU 3 1 question · 1 approval · 1 verify ADDED BY AGENTS +5 pieces since Mon, unapproved
ROADMAP · PIECES DONE OVER PIECES KNOWN Tech choices and repodecided Mon 6 / 6 Deploy and CIone question open, blocks 2 8 / 10 Billing3 agents in flight 12 / 25 +3 Landing pagesready, nobody holds it 2 / 10 +2 Pricing page and plan copywaiting on you: no tasks approved yet 0 / 7
IN FLIGHT · LEASES RENEW ON CHECKPOINT sub-1 T-117 Stripe webhooks 31m · ckpt 4m ago sub-2 T-118 Invoice PDF 44m · ckpt 1m ago sub-3 T-119 Plan picker rebase needed
WAITING ON YOU Q-9 Fly or Render for the worker? sub-1 approve T-126 Proration on plan change sub-2 verify T-116 Webhook retries, 2 checks passed sub-1
BILLING · PIECES KNOWN OVER TIME indigo: you approved · red: agents proposed, not yet approved 30 15 0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri you approved 6 you approved 4 sub-2 proposed 2 sub-1 proposed 1 done 12

approved scopeadded by agents since you approvedneeds you

The same record helps agents continue the work and helps you understand it.

Why it works

Shared state that helps the next action.

declr keeps the working record and applies a few coordination rules. Your agents use the result to decide what to do next.

An overlap comes with context.

If a path is already held, the agent gets the holder, task and expiry. It can narrow its scope, coordinate or choose other work.

A failure gets a record.

Before completion, reported failing checks need a filed issue. The next agent has a specific finding to consult.

A handoff includes evidence.

Completed work goes to needs_verify with its checks attached. A different actor verifies or rejects it.

New work stays connected.

Tasks belong to the roadmap. Work without a parent waits for approval, so additions stay visible.

And what it keeps on the record

Resume with the trail.

Branch, worktree, base commit and last checkpoint help the next session continue.

See what changed underneath.

Recorded changes on held paths tell the agent when its working base needs attention.

Find what is already known.

Recorded issues and decisions can be retrieved by path before the next edit.

Drops in

Your tracker keeps the human view

One issue in your tracker maps to one node in declr. Subtasks, leases, checkpoints, questions and evidence stay in declr and roll up as a single comment, edited in place. declr's done sets your In Review. A person closes.

GitHub IssuesLinearJiraTrello importMCP serverClaude Code skillCursor rulesRESTpost commit hook

Pricing

Twenty dollars a month per person, every agent included

A$20 per person, a month
about US$13 · about €12

Founding cohort: the first fifty people keep this price for two years. Cancel any time.

  • Every workspace you create, every agent you run
  • Next, leases, overlap checks, evidence and verify
  • Roadmap with counted progress and the creep chart
  • GitHub Issues sync at launch, Linear and Jira next
  • MCP server, Claude Code skill, Cursor rules, REST
  • A person is anyone who opens the dashboard. Agents are not people.

Reserve

What do your agents keep needing from you?

Tell us where you keep stepping in: repeating context, coordinating work or checking what actually finished.

Questions

Short answers

Does declr read my code?

declr works with the task context and metadata your agents send: decisions, checkpoints, declared paths, commit hashes and evidence. It does not need to read your repository’s source files.

Does it call a model?

Search embeddings on task titles are the only model call. Your own agent handles planning, decomposition, tagging and dependency reasoning.

Who writes the roadmap?

Your agent does, from your brief, through the skill. declr stores it, counts it, and draws it. You approve the nodes.

Is this a replacement for Linear or Jira?

No. It is the layer underneath, at agent granularity. Your board stays at human granularity and nobody on your team has to open declr except the person running the agents.

What about a TODO.md or another local tracker?

A local file is read by two agents in two worktrees and both proceed. Nothing refuses the second one in real time, and nothing stops the author from marking its own work verified. declr runs those checks at call time from one shared database, and holds the plan for the parts of the project that are not code.